Comments on: #picnic09: De toekomst van social media http://www.publishr.nl/2009/09/picnic09-de-toekomst-van-social-media/ tips en trends in uitgeefland Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:40:44 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Storytelling « Guido’s Blog http://www.publishr.nl/2009/09/picnic09-de-toekomst-van-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1935 Storytelling « Guido’s Blog Sat, 03 Oct 2009 07:28:05 +0000 http://www.publishr.nl/?p=2507#comment-1935 [...] niet toe te schrijven aan 1 eigenaar. Dit zal in de toekomst nog veel meer voorkomen en leiden tot Total Copyright Gridlock; het is onduidelijk wie de originele bron [...] [...] niet toe te schrijven aan 1 eigenaar. Dit zal in de toekomst nog veel meer voorkomen en leiden tot Total Copyright Gridlock; het is onduidelijk wie de originele bron [...]

]]> By: Gerd Leonhard http://www.publishr.nl/2009/09/picnic09-de-toekomst-van-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1835 Gerd Leonhard Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:43:14 +0000 http://www.publishr.nl/?p=2507#comment-1835 Jan nobody is refuting that authors should earn money. Nobody is suggesting to throw away copyright. Watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YaVLNGLDhQ and then let me know what you think! Cheers Gerd Jan nobody is refuting that authors should earn money. Nobody is suggesting to throw away copyright. Watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YaVLNGLDhQ and then let me know what you think! Cheers Gerd

]]> By: Jan http://www.publishr.nl/2009/09/picnic09-de-toekomst-van-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1757 Jan Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:43:52 +0000 http://www.publishr.nl/?p=2507#comment-1757 Total copyright gridlock? Yes, when looking at the music industry itself. No, when looking at necessary revenues (monetize?) for those that make (write) music. It would be stupid to throw a whole body of law away because an industry is taking away too much money from the ones that have the creativity. So music authors should start using the rigths given to them by copyright law. They then should use the regained power to facilitate their own (social) network to allow the ones in their network to download their music legally and for free. And that those who want to earn money from using music should pay a fee for the licence. All this can be done by using the internet as a distribution and fee earning system. In this way the social networks around music(ians) can get stronger, the networks can then be used to monetize on the strength of the network aimed at those that want to earn money from music. A perfect business model and also adressing most of the issues of Leonhard: A nice bit of quotes, beautifully told but not a solution to the problem. The music author should still be enabled to eran money from his creativity. Total copyright gridlock? Yes, when looking at the music industry itself. No, when looking at necessary revenues (monetize?) for those that make (write) music. It would be stupid to throw a whole body of law away because an industry is taking away too much money from the ones that have the creativity. So music authors should start using the rigths given to them by copyright law. They then should use the regained power to facilitate their own (social) network to allow the ones in their network to download their music legally and for free. And that those who want to earn money from using music should pay a fee for the licence. All this can be done by using the internet as a distribution and fee earning system.

In this way the social networks around music(ians) can get stronger, the networks can then be used to monetize on the strength of the network aimed at those that want to earn money from music. A perfect business model and also adressing most of the issues of Leonhard: A nice bit of quotes, beautifully told but not a solution to the problem. The music author should still be enabled to eran money from his creativity.

]]>